Chris David Tabb v. Malee Wood et al
| Chris David Tabb |
| Malee Wood and Does 1-25 |
| 2:2024cv02817 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Chris David Tabb. upon Malee Wood waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/12/2024, answer due 6/11/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Matthew C. Brown. (Hendricks, William) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris David Tabb, identifying Robin Lynnae Tabb, Craig Robert Tabb. (Hendricks, William) |
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kd)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, must be filled out and then flattened by using the Adobe Print to PDF option and saved to computer. Then, upload each document separately using the correct event. Please review the link to properly upload documents. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/faq/technical-pdf-related/what-does-error-mean-error-document-malformed-or-contains-code-which-may (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening). Other error(s) with document(s): The Pro-Se 10 Complaint is not accepted for Attorney Case Opening submissions. To initiate a case, you need to submit a Civil Complaint following the format specified by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. Additional guidance on completing the title page for electronically filed documents can be found in F.R.Civ.P. 11. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION Complaint fir Conversion of Property Receipt No: ACACDC-37242133 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Chris David Tabb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney William Daniel Hendricks added to party Chris David Tabb(pty:pla))(Hendricks, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
