Oi Lam Poon v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Oi Lam Poon |
| Secretary of DHS Alexandar Mayorkas, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, ROSEMARY LANGLEY MELVILLE and Director of USCIS Tracy Renaud |
| 2:2024cv02888 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Daher, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Daher, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Daher, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Daher, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Daher, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37254313 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Oi Lam Poon. (Attorney Anthony Alex Daher added to party Oi Lam Poon(pty:pla))(Daher, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
