Sima Rafieerad v. Merrick B. Garland et al
Sima Rafieerad |
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ted H. Kim |
2:2024cv02956 |
April 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dolly M Gee |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kd) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sima Rafieerad. (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sima Rafieerad, (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sima Rafieerad. (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37271924 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Sima Rafieerad. (Attorney Lisa Suzanne Anderson added to party Sima Rafieerad(pty:pla))(Anderson, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.