Hadis Yousefi v. Merrick B. Garland et al
| Hadis Yousefi |
| Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ted H. Kim |
| 2:2024cv02973 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF Hadis Yousefi. (Anderson, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hadis Yousefi, (Anderson, Lisa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hadis Yousefi. (Anderson, Lisa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37275443 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Hadis Yousefi. (Attorney Lisa Suzanne Anderson added to party Hadis Yousefi(pty:pla))(Anderson, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
