Chen Chen v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Chen Chen |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David Radel and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 2:2024cv03004 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chen Chen. (Shen, Chunping) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chen Chen, (Shen, Chunping) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chen Chen. (Shen, Chunping) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37278678 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Chen Chen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Chunping Shen added to party Chen Chen(pty:pla))(Shen, Chunping) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
