Martha A. Flores v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. et al
| Martha A. Flores |
| Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., Transcoma Cruises, Transcoma Cruises USA LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2024cv03023 |
| April 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., Transcoma Cruises, Transcoma Cruises USA LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martha A. Flores, (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Martha A. Flores. (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martha A. Flores. (Coone, Aksana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37281455 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Martha A. Flores. (Attorney Aksana Moshaiv Coone added to party Martha A. Flores(pty:pla))(Coone, Aksana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
