Stephanie Brenda Vazquez v. Walmart Inc. et al
| STEPHANIE BRENDA VAZQUEZ |
| WALMART INC.; and Freeman Investment Holding Limited |
| 2:2024cv03085 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice to Adverse Party filed by Defendant Freeman Investment Holding Limited. (Ju, Tianyu) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Tianyu Ju, Esq. re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Freeman Investment Holding Limited. (Ju, Tianyu) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Freeman Investment Holding Limited, (Ju, Tianyu) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Freeman Investment Holding Limited. (Ju, Tianyu) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23CHCV03273 Receipt No: ACACDC-37289837 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Freeman Investment Holding Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10) (Attorney Tianyu Ju added to party Freeman Investment Holding Limited(pty:dft))(Ju, Tianyu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
