Alan Kapilow v. Marshall Field et al
Alan Kapilow |
Marshall Field |
2:2024cv03105 |
April 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37293815 - Fee: $405, filed by PlaIntiff Alan Kapilow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71, #2 Summons, #3 Certificate of interested Parties) (Attorney Gus Herman Gunderman added to party Alan Kapilow(pty:pla))(Gunderman, Gus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alan Kapilow v. Marshall Field et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alan Kapilow | |
Represented By: | Gus Herman Gunderman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Marshall Field | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.