Phillip Haywood v. Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office et al
| Phillip Haywood |
| Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office, Adobe Google Microsoft, SRO Housing Corporation DTLA and City of Los Angeles California |
| 2:2024cv03127 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| George H Wu |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Phillip Haywood. (sh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Phillip Haywood, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Adobe Google Microsoft, City of Los Angeles California, SRO Housing Corporation DTLA, Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office.Case assigned to Judge George H Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim., filed by Plaintiff Phillip Haywood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
