DOT Operating Authority Inc. v. DOT Filing And Compliance et al
DOT Operating Authority Inc. |
DOT Filing And Compliance and Diana Lrtshikyan |
2:2024cv03171 |
April 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc., identifying DOT Operating Authority Inc., DOT Filing And Compliance, and Diana Lrtshikyan. (Trojan, R.) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37305621 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney R. Joseph Trojan added to party DOT Operating Authority Inc.(pty:pla))(Trojan, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.