DOT Operating Authority Inc. v. DOT Filing And Compliance et al
| DOT Operating Authority Inc. |
| DOT Filing And Compliance and Diana Lrtshikyan |
| 2:2024cv03171 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Alka Sagar |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-03171 SPG(ASx). (rn)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Diana Lrtshikyan answer now due 6/18/2024; DOT Filing And Compliance answer now due 6/18/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Diana Lrtshikyan; DOT Filing And Compliance.(Attorney Eduardo Martorell added to party DOT Filing And Compliance(pty:dft), Attorney Eduardo Martorell added to party Diana Lrtshikyan(pty:dft))(Martorell, Eduardo) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc., upon Defendant Diana Lrtshikyan served on 4/28/2024, answer due 5/20/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Lrtshikyan, an individual defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc., upon Defendant DOT Filing And Compliance served on 4/28/2024, answer due 5/20/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Lrtshikyan, Agent of Service for DOT Filing And Compliance in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants DOT Filing And Compliance and Diana Lrtshikyan. (Attachments: #1 DianaL) (jtil) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc., identifying DOT Operating Authority Inc., DOT Filing And Compliance, and Diana Lrtshikyan. (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Trojan, R.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37305621 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff DOT Operating Authority Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney R. Joseph Trojan added to party DOT Operating Authority Inc.(pty:pla))(Trojan, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
