Alexis Cernas et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe and Beatriz Loera |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Carlos Maciel and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 2:2024cv03261 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera, (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37320518 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Beatriz Loera, Alexis Cernas, John I.C. Doe, Jane I.C. Doe. (Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Alexis Cernas(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Jane I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party John I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Beatriz Loera(pty:pla))(Carrillo, Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
