Alexis Cernas et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe and Beatriz Loera |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Carlos Maciel, DOES 1 through 10 and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv03261 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT Carlos Maciel, identifying Alexis Cernas; John I.C. Doe, a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Maritza Casillas; Jane I.C. Doe, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Maritza Casillas; Beatriz Loera; County of Los Angeles; Carlos Maciel. (Keuper, Janet) |
| Filing 31 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANT Carlos Maciel.(Attorney Janet L Keuper added to party Carlos Maciel(pty:dft))(Keuper, Janet) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance, #28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 29
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/20/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 7/3/2024 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Dale K Galipo on behalf of Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera (Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Alexis Cernas(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Jane I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party John I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Beatriz Loera(pty:pla))(Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Beatriz Loera, Alexis Cernas, John I.C. Doe, Jane I.C. Doe, upon Defendant Carlos Maciel served on 5/16/2024, answer due 6/6/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Watch Commander Sergeant Ay in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT County of Los Angeles, identifying Alexis Cernas; John I.C. Doe, a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Maritza Casillas; Jane I.C. Doe, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Maritza Casillas; Beatriz Loera; County of Los Angeles; Carlos Maciel. (Keuper, Janet) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANT County of Los Angeles.(Keuper, Janet) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-03261 SPG(SKx). (rn)
|
| Filing 23 DECLARATION of JOHN I.C. DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARITZA CASILLAS, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ARTURO CERNAS (C.C.P. 377.32) filed by Plaintiff John I.C. Doe. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of JANE I.C. DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARITZA CASILLAS, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ARTURO CERNAS (C.C.P. 377.32) filed by Plaintiff Jane I.C. Doe. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of ALEXIS CERNAS, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ARTURO CERNAS (C.C.P. 377.32) filed by Plaintiff Alexis Cernas. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nicole Rachel Castronovo counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Adding NICOLE R. CASTRONOVO as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attorney Nicole Rachel Castronovo added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Castronovo, Nicole) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph Peter Esposito counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Adding JOSEPH P. ESPOSITO as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attorney Joseph Peter Esposito added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Esposito, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 5/31/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by DEFENDANT County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Janet L Keuper added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Keuper, Janet) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF MARITZA CASILLAS FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE MINOR JANE I.C. DOE #11 by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT MARITZA CASILLAS shall be appointed as the guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiff, Jane I.C. Doe. (es)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF MARITZA CASILLAS FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE MINOR JOHN I.C. DOE #10 by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT MARITZA CASILLAS shall be appointed as the guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiff, JOHN I.C. DOE. (es)
|
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of MARITZA CASILLAS IN FURTHER SUPPORT FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE MINOR PLAINTIFFS JOHN I.C. DOE AND JANE I.C. DOE re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #13 filed by Plaintiffs Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Beatriz Loera, Alexis Cernas, John I.C. Doe, Jane I.C. Doe, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 4/24/2024, answer due 5/15/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon BRUCE CROUCHET - DEPUTY CLERK in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Carrillo, Luis) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES (In Chambers): Order re: Two Applications for Appointment of GuardianAd Litem of Minor Plaintiffs (ECF Nos. #10 , #11 ) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: The Court ORDERS Maritza Casillas to file a declaration under penalty of perjury testifying, as appropriate, to (1) the facts contained in each of the Applications, and (2) confirming that she (a) is qualified to understand and protect the rights of each of the Plaintiffs, and (b) has no known or foreseeable interests adverse to the interests of each of the Plaintiffs. The declaration is to be filed no later than April 30, 2024. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for Appointment of Maritza Casillas as Guardian ad Litem for Jane I.C. Doe filed by Plaintiff Jane I.C. Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Appointment of Maritza Casillas as Guardian ad Litem for John I.C. Doe filed by Plaintiff John I.C. Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7.. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, Carlos Maciel. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera, (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Cernas, Jane I.C. Doe, John I.C. Doe, Beatriz Loera. (Carrillo, Luis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37320518 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Beatriz Loera, Alexis Cernas, John I.C. Doe, Jane I.C. Doe. (Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Alexis Cernas(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Jane I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party John I.C. Doe(pty:pla), Attorney Luis Allen Carrillo added to party Beatriz Loera(pty:pla))(Carrillo, Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
