Xing Ming v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Xing Ming |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and David Radel |
| 2:2024cv03346 |
| April 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant United States Attorney's Office (car) |
| Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (car) |
| Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (car) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Xing Ming (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.(Filing fee $ 405 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Xing Ming. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
