Jose Daniel Hernandez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jose Daniel Hernandez
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2024cv03471
Filed: April 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
April 26, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
April 26, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap)
April 26, 2024 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, identifying Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., a Japanese entity; Jose Daniel Hernandez, Plaintiff. (Harlow, Charles)
April 26, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Harlow, Charles)
April 26, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV09366 Receipt No: ACACDC-37367388 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration - Complaint, summons and service, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration - Answer to Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration - Sale Contract, #5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration - State Court Orders, Notices) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles)
April 26, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/9/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2)(ghap)
April 26, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Nissan North America, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jose Daniel Hernandez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/27/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Daniel Hernandez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Daniel Hernandez
Represented By: Kevin Y Jacobson
Represented By: Allen Amarkarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Frederick Harlow
Represented By: Michael Donn Mortenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?