Derrick L. Johnson v. California et al
Derrick L. Johnson |
California, Starbucks Corporation, Alan I. Rubin, Jennifer Villagomez, Diana Silva and Wesley Ikeda |
2:2024cv03735 |
May 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Derrick L. Johnson, re Summons Issued #4 served on 5/7/24. (car) |
Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Derrick L. Johnson, re Summons Issued #3 served on 5/7/24. (car) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Alan I. Rubin(in individual capacity), Alan I. Rubin(in official capacity). (car) |
Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (car) |
Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant California. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Derrick L. Johnson (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar.(Filing fee $405 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Derrick L. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.