City of Pomona v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al.
| City of Pomona |
| Dow Chemical Company The and Shell USA, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv03957 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona. (Sansone, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona. (Sansone, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona. Related Case(s): 2:18-CV-08199-MWF-SPx; 5:18-cv-02022-MWF-SPx; 2:18-cv-10139-MWF-SPx; 5:19-cv-00842-MWF-SPx; 5:20-cv-00881-MWF-SPx; 2:20-cv-07765-MWF-SPx; 5:20-cv-02562-MWF-SPx; 5:21-cv-00173-MWF-SPx; and 2:21-cv-02958-MWF-SPx (Sansone, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona, identifying City of South Pomona. (Sansone, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona. (Sansone, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37454733 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff City of Pomona. (Attorney Kenneth A Sansone added to party City of Pomona(pty:pla))(Sansone, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
