John Rad v. Mitra Nabati et al
John Rad |
Mitra Nabati, Individually and as Trustee of the Mitra Nabati Survivor's Trust and as Trustee of the Bahram Nabati Unified Credit Trust, Pejman Sage and Does 1-10 Inclusive |
2:2024cv03996 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Rad. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Rad. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Rad. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Rad, identifying Plaintiff John Rad. Defendant Mitra Nabati, Individually and as Trustee of the Mitra Nabati Survivor's Trust and as Trustee of the Bahram Nabati Unified Credit Trust, Defendant Pejman Sage. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37462621 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff John Rad. (Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party John Rad(pty:pla))(Weiser, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.