Shengmei Zheng v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
| Shengmei Zheng |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
| 2:2024cv04201 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Civil Standing Order by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (wm)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shengmei Zheng, identifying Ur M. Jaddou; et al.. (Chen, Wei) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Shengmei Zheng. (Chen, Wei) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shengmei Zheng. (Chen, Wei) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37504285 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Shengmei Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Wei Chen added to party Shengmei Zheng(pty:pla))(Chen, Wei) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
