Kangen Chen v. Ur M. Jaddou
Kangen Chen |
Ur M. Jaddou |
2:2024cv04203 |
May 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D Pregerson |
Karen L Stevenson |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Kangen Chen pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Ur M. Jaddou. (Sun, Guodi) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Other error(s) with document(s): The request for issuance of summons is attached to docket entry 9 and not the Complaint. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 9 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (405 paid on 05/21/2024, receipt number ACACDC-37506297), filed by plaintiff Kangen Chen.(Sun, Guodi) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED FILED AS CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kangen Chen. (Sun, Guodi) Modified on 5/23/2024 (ghap). |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kangen Chen. (Sun, Guodi) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Kangen Chen. (Sun, Guodi) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37506297 - Fee: $405, filed by Kangen Chen Kangen Chen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Guodi Sun added to party Kangen Chen(pty:pla))(Sun, Guodi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kangen Chen v. Ur M. Jaddou | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kangen Chen | |
Represented By: | Guodi Sun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou | |
Represented By: | Oil Appellate |
Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.