4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. et al v. Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners et al
4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. |
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Does 1-50, Inclusive and City of Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners |
2:2024cv04816 |
June 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margo A Rocconi |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm) |
Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc..(Kroll, Ryan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ryan Michael Kroll on behalf of Plaintiff 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. (Attorney Ryan Michael Kroll added to party 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc.(pty:pla))(Kroll, Ryan) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned addressed to Joshua Kaplan re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 (lc) |
Filing 9 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for August 19, 2024 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Benham, Matthew) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR Motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) Modified on 6/12/2024 (lc). |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc., upon Defendant City of Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners served on 5/8/2024, answer due 5/29/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rita Ramirez Deputy Clerk authorized to accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service Filed in State Court on 5/13/2024 Submitted with Attachment 9 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc., upon Plaintiff City of Los Angeles served on 5/8/2024, answer due 5/29/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rita Ramirez Deputy Clerk authorized to accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Filed in State Court on 5/13/2024 Submitted with Attachment 8 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Does 1-50, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. Filed in State Court on 5/2/2024 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Benham, Matthew) |
Filing 2 City of Los Angeles' CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, (Benham, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 24STCV11052 Receipt No: ACACDC-37616453 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Exhibit 5 - Notice of Case Management, #6 Exhibit 6 - Notice of Unavailability, #7 Exhibit 7 - Notice of Case Managment, #8 Exhibit 8 - Proof of Service, #9 Exhibit 9 - Proof of Service, #10 Exhibit 10 - Stamped Summons) (Attorney Matthew Peter Chan Benham added to party CITY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:bkmov))(Benham, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.