4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. et al v. Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners et al
| 4600 Sunset Blvd. Inc. |
| Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES |
| 2:2024cv04816 |
| June 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Benham, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 City of Los Angeles' CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, (Benham, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 24STCV11052 Receipt No: ACACDC-37616453 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Exhibit 5 - Notice of Case Management, #6 Exhibit 6 - Notice of Unavailability, #7 Exhibit 7 - Notice of Case Managment, #8 Exhibit 8 - Proof of Service, #9 Exhibit 9 - Proof of Service, #10 Exhibit 10 - Stamped Summons) (Attorney Matthew Peter Chan Benham added to party CITY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:bkmov))(Benham, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
