Interum Group Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
| interum Group Inc. |
| zoom video Communications, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv05397 |
| June 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. ORDER case transferred from Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett to the calendar of Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-05397-CAS-JCx. Signed by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Judge Christina A. Snyder. (vp)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc., identifying BlackRock, Inc., The Vanguard Group, Entities Affiliated with Emergence Capital Partners, and Puccini World Limited. (Jones, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Stipulation #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. answer now due 8/30/2024, filed by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc..(Attorney Andrew Louis Perito added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft))(Perito, Andrew) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-05397 SPG(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , as to Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (shb) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff interum Group Inc.. (Oliak, Beth) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by interum Group Inc.. (Oliak, Beth) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff interum Group Inc. (Oliak, Beth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff interum Group Inc.. (Oliak, Beth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37721796 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff interum Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Beth Ann Oliak added to party interum Group Inc.(pty:pla))(Oliak, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
