Ronald Dixson Jr. v. Carmax Inc. et al
Ronald, Jr. Dixson |
CarMax, Inc., CarMax Auto Superstores Inc. and CarMax Enterprise Services LLC |
2:2024cv05728 |
July 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Hernan D Vera |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera: The Court sets a Status Conference re Settlement #16 for October 15, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Ronald, Jr. Dixson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Mailing)(Smith, Evan) |
Filing 15 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (wm) |
Filing 14 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (wm) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CarMax Auto Superstores Inc. answer now due 8/14/2024; CarMax Enterprise Services LLC answer now due 8/14/2024; CarMax, Inc. answer now due 8/14/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores Inc. ; CarMax Enterprise Services LLC; CarMax, Inc..(Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 12 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-05728 HDV(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ronald, Jr. Dixson, upon Defendant CarMax, Inc. served on 6/14/2024. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity [FILED IN STATE COURT 6/20/2024 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ronald, Jr. Dixson, upon Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores Inc. served on 6/6/2024. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity [FILED IN STATE COURT 6/20/2024 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ronald, Jr. Dixson, upon Defendant CarMax Enterprise Services LLC served on 6/6/2024. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity [FILED IN STATE COURT 06/20/2024 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., CarMax Enterprise Services LLC, CarMax, Inc.. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Ronald, Jr. Dixson. [FILED IN STATE COURT 6/5/2024 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT A ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., CarMax Enterprise Services LLC, CarMax, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 7/8/2024. (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CarMax Enterprise Services LLC, identifying CarMax, Inc.. (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Lynn R. Fiorentino on behalf of Defendant CarMax Enterprise Services LLC (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CarMax, Inc., identifying CarMax, Inc.. (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., identifying CarMax, Inc.. (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., CarMax Enterprise Services LLC, CarMax, Inc.. (Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STCV13956 Receipt No: ACACDC-37791317 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., CarMax Enterprise Services LLC, CarMax, Inc.. (Attorney Lynn R. Fiorentino added to party CarMax Auto Superstores Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney Lynn R. Fiorentino added to party CarMax Enterprise Services LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Lynn R. Fiorentino added to party CarMax, Inc.(pty:dft))(Fiorentino, Lynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.