John Hancock Life Insurance Company U.S.A. v. The Estate of Susan G. Stettner, et al
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) |
The Estate of Susan G. Stettner, and Dana Rubenstein |
2:2024cv05876 |
July 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). (Murray, Misty) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). (Murray, Misty) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). (Murray, Misty) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.), (Murray, Misty) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) identifying Manulife Financial Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Murray, Misty) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37821069 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). (Attorney Misty A. Murray added to party John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.)(pty:pla))(Murray, Misty) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.