Huang Law Group v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Huang Law Group |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2024cv06112 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Brian Vincent Schaeffer on behalf of Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Attorney Brian Vincent Schaeffer added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Schaeffer, Brian) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (cr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-06112 JLS(SSCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Huang Law Group, identifying None. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Huang Law Group. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Huang Law Group. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37871508 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Huang Law Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Huang Law Group(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Huang Law Group v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Huang Law Group | |
| Represented By: | Michael Chen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
| Represented By: | Brian Vincent Schaeffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
