Signal Technology Foundation v. J2 Cloud Services, LLC
Signal Technology Foundation |
J2 Cloud Services LLC |
2:2024cv06168 |
July 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
George H Wu |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge George H Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-06168 GW(PDx). (rn) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant J2 Cloud Services LLC. (sh) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation (White, Benjamin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation, (White, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37883277 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Benjamin Sperling White added to party Signal Technology Foundation(pty:pla))(White, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Signal Technology Foundation v. J2 Cloud Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Signal Technology Foundation | |
Represented By: | Spencer Owen |
Represented By: | John M Kim |
Represented By: | Benjamin Sperling White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: J2 Cloud Services LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.