Signal Technology Foundation v. J2 Cloud Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Signal Technology Foundation
Defendant: J2 Cloud Services LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv06168
Filed: July 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
August 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge George H Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-06168 GW(PDx). (rn)
July 24, 2024 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant J2 Cloud Services LLC. (sh)
July 24, 2024 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
July 24, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
July 24, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh)
July 23, 2024 Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin)
July 23, 2024 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation (White, Benjamin)
July 23, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation, (White, Benjamin)
July 23, 2024 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin)
July 23, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (White, Benjamin)
July 23, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37883277 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Signal Technology Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Benjamin Sperling White added to party Signal Technology Foundation(pty:pla))(White, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Signal Technology Foundation v. J2 Cloud Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Signal Technology Foundation
Represented By: Spencer Owen
Represented By: John M Kim
Represented By: Benjamin Sperling White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J2 Cloud Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?