Courtney Mitchener v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
| Courtney Mitchener |
| Does 1 through 25, inclusive and Fanduel, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv06410 |
| July 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Courtney Mitchener, identifying None. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Courtney Mitchener. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Courtney Mitchener. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37926233 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Courtney Mitchener. (Attorney Robert Tauler added to party Courtney Mitchener(pty:pla))(Tauler, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
