David Martinez v. Martin O'Malley
David Martinez |
Martin O'Malley |
2:2024cv06471 |
July 31, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAS BEEN REVISED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 2022. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. In accordance with General Order 05-01, this case is designated for electronic filing. A chambers copy is not required unless ordered by the court. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the following instructions: (see document for details). (hr) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support. (hr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:24-cv-06471 AGR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff David Martinez. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Martinez, (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Martinez. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Martinez. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff David Martinez. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party David Martinez(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: David Martinez v. Martin O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Martinez | |
Represented By: | Lawrence D Rohlfing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Michael K Marriott |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.