Aurora Higuera Lopez v. Amway Corp. et al
Aurora Higuera Lopez |
Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp. and Does 1 to 20, inclusive |
2:2024cv06917 |
August 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 - 7 days, filed by Defendants Amway Corp., Access Business Group LLC.. (Kapur, Vandana) |
![]() |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from September 23, 2024 to ____________, 2024 filed by Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Kapur Declaration ISO Stipulation to Continue, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Continue)(Kapur, Vandana) |
Filing 9 (Younessi, Ramin) |
![]() |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp., re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 served on 08/16/2024. (Zins, David) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp., Does. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Aurora Higuera Lopez.[FILED IN STATE COURT 6/7/2024 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp.[FILED IN STATE COURT 8/12/2024 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 7 EXHIBIT G TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, identifying Aurora Higuera Lopez, Amway Corp., Access Business Group LLC, Alticor Corporate Enterprises Inc., Alticor Inc., Solstice Holdings Inc., Alticor Global Holdings Inc., Markel Bermuda Limited. (Zins, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp.. (Zins, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior, case number 24STCV14345 Receipt No: ACACDC-38030987 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendants Access Business Group LLC, Amway Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E to Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F to Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit G to Notice of Removal, #8 Declaration Seurynck ISO Notice of Removal, #9 Declaration Zins ISO Notice of Removal, #10 Exhibit 1 to Zins Declaration, #11 Exhibit 2 to Zins Declaration, #12 Exhibit 3 to Zins Declaration) (Attorney David P. Zins added to party Access Business Group LLC(pty:dft), Attorney David P. Zins added to party Amway Corp.(pty:dft))(Zins, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.