Ernestina Antimo v. Martin J. O'Malley
Ernestina Antimo |
Martin J. O'Malley |
2:2024cv06986 |
August 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:24-cv-06986 JDE on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Tarn added to party Martin J. O'Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
![]() |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Ernestina Antimo. (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Subject to any ruling by the District Judge on Plaintiff's Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the parties are directed to comply with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective 12/1/22, as well as the Local Rules of this Court and the Fed. R. Civ. P., as applicable, in presenting the matter for decision by the Court. All briefs must comply with the Local Civil Rules, including Local Civil Rules 11-6.1 and 11-6.2. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mba) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ernestina Antimo, (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ernestina Antimo. (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ernestina Antimo. (Kalagian, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Ernestina Antimo. (Attorney Marc V Kalagian added to party Ernestina Antimo(pty:pla))(Kalagian, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ernestina Antimo v. Martin J. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ernestina Antimo | |
Represented By: | Marc V Kalagian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Tarn |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.