Peggie A. Williams v. Ticketmaster, LLC
| Peggy A. Williams |
| Ticketmaster, LLC |
| 2:2024cv07081 |
| August 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED IN PART, as follows: The deadline for Defendant Ticketmaster L.L.C. to answer, plead, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint (including, without limitation, the deadline for Defendant to file a motion to compel arbitration, the right to file which has not been waived) is hereby extended to 30 days after either the filing of a Consolidated Complaint in Ryan, et al. v. Ticketmaster, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-04482-SPG-MAA (C.D. Cal.) or the issuance of an order by Judge Garnett denying the July 11, 2024 Motion to Consolidate in the Ryan Action (Ryan Action, ECF No. 32 ), or denying it as to this action. The parties shall file a joint report as to the status of proceedings in the Ryan Action on the earlier of November 15, 2024, or within 10 days of any material development in that matter. Thereafter, the parties shall file a joint report on the status of proceedings in the Ryan action on the earlier of every 60 days, or within 10 days of either the filing of a Consolidated Complaint or the issuance of an order by Judge Garnett on the July 11, 2024 Motion to Consolidate. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC. Related Case(s): 2:24-cv-04482-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-04580-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-04625-JFW-PVC; 2:24-cv-04631-JLS-MRW; 2:24-cv-04659-SPG-MAA; 2:24-cv-04671-JLS-PD; 2:24-cv-04674-SPG-MAA; 2:24-cv-04709-JLS-JC; 2:24-cv-04726-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-04773-JLS-PVC; 2:24-cv-04973-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-06940-MEMF-AS; 2:24-cv-05760-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-05867-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-06125-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-06530-SPG-JC; 2:24-cv-06604-SVW-AS; 2:24-cv-07446-GHW-MAA (Carlton, D.) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC, identifying Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. (Carlton, D.) |
| Filing 19 STATEMENT Joint Statement Re Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC re: Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,, 18 . (Carlton, D.) |
|
Filing 18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE RENEWED STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND (DKT. #17 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On September 30, 2024, the parties filed a Renewed Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (DKT. #17 ). It requests an extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint until 30 days after either the filing of a Consolidated Complaint in Ryan, et al. v. Ticketmaster, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-04482-SPG-MAA (C.D. Cal.) (the "Ryan Action") or Judge Garnett's denial of the July 11, 2024 Motion to Consolidate in the Ryan Action (Ryan Action, ECF No. 32). After a review of the Ryan docket, it does not appear that this case has been identified in any of the pending motions before Judge Garnett. Accordingly, on or before October 5, 2024, the parties shall file a joint statement explaining the basis for the request, and any modification that is appropriate. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sea) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 17 Renewed STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the later of 30 days after filing of Consolidated Complaint or denial of Motion to Consolidate re Amended Complaint #13 filed by Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Renewed Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint)(Carlton, D.) |
|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On September 27, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. The Stipulation requests an extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the later of September 30, 2024, or 30 days after either the filing of a Consolidated Complaint in Ryan, et al. v. Ticketmaster, LLC, et al. (the "Ryan Action"), or the denial of the July 11, 2024 Motion to Consolidated in the Ryan Action. However, because the current deadline to respond is October 7, 2024, it appears that the parties erred in the request as to the September 30, 2024 date. On or before October 2, 2024, the parties shall file either an updated stipulation clarifying the requested date of extension or a statement that the September 30, 2024 date was the intended one. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sea) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the later of September 30, 2024 or 30 days after filing of Consolidated Complaint or denial of Motion to Consolidate re Amended Complaint #13 filed by Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint)(Attorney D. Scott Carlton added to party Ticketmaster, LLC(pty:dft))(Carlton, D.) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff Peggy A. Williams. (yl) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Ticketmaster, LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Peggy A. Williams (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)(yl) |
| Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. A signed Certification and Notice of Interested Parties #2 must be filed no later than September 3, 2024. (tj) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Complaint #1 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The initiating document lacks a cover page and signature. Plaintiff shall cure the deficiency noted in Dkt. no. #4 no later than September 3, 2024. (tj) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document lacks required signature. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Discovery) #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): Document lacks required signature. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery) #1 filed by Plaintiff Peggy A. Williams. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Peggy A. Williams. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Peggy A. Williams against Defendant Ticketmaster, LLC. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peggie A. Williams v. Ticketmaster, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ticketmaster, LLC | |
| Represented By: | D. Scott Carlton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peggy A. Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
