Diego Guzman v. Martin O'Malley
Diego Guzman |
Martin O'Malley |
2:2024cv07082 |
August 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Terry J Hatter |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support CV-60-1 form In place of Form CV-60. filed by Plaintiff Diego Guzman. (Gilinger, Lisa) |
Filing 9 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr, re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: (1) Refile a fully completed Request on the Court's CV-60 form, including disclosing all sources of income and their amounts, as well as all assets and their value, and separately addressing the discrepancy above in a statement not to exceed one page; OR (2) Pay the full filing fee of $405. If the filer does not comply with these instructions within 30 days, this case will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (es) |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Tarn added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 FOR COURT USE ONLY: STATISTICAL CORRECTION re #5 MOTION for Order re: #6 Order (es) |
Filing 6 [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . See document for details and deadlines. (es) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) Modified on 8/22/2024 (im). |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Diego Guzman. (Gilinger, Lisa) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Diego Guzman. (Gilinger, Lisa) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Diego Guzman, identifying none. (Gilinger, Lisa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Diego Guzman. (Attorney Lisa C Gilinger added to party Diego Guzman(pty:pla))(Gilinger, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Diego Guzman v. Martin O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Diego Guzman | |
Represented By: | Lisa C Gilinger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Jennifer Tarn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.