Sattar Mobayen et al v. Antony J. Blinken et al
SATTAR MOBAYEN and AFSANE MOBAYEN |
ROBERT JACHIM and Antony J. Blinken |
2:2024cv07456 |
August 31, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by plaintiffs AFSANE MOBAYEN, SATTAR MOBAYEN. (Morrison, Curtis) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs AFSANE MOBAYEN, SATTAR MOBAYEN, identifying N/a. (Morrison, Curtis) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs AFSANE MOBAYEN, SATTAR MOBAYEN. (Morrison, Curtis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38135137 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiffs SATTAR MOBAYEN, AFSANE MOBAYEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Plaintiff Afsane 221(g) Non-Final Notice, #2 Exhibit B, April 7, 2024 Declaration of Carson Wu, #3 Exhibit C, CEAC Online Case Status, #4 Exhibit D, Example Inquiries from Plaintiffs and Response from Defendants, #5 Exhibit E, Doctors Note for Plaintiff Sattar and MASOUMEH MABADI, #6 Exhibit F, Doctors Note for Plaintiff Sattar, #7 Exhibit G, Doctors Note for MASOUMEH MABADI) (Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party AFSANE MOBAYEN(pty:pla), Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party SATTAR MOBAYEN(pty:pla))(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.