David Matthews v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2024cv07581
Filed: September 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2024 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AT&T Services, Inc. answer now due 11/4/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant AT&T Services, Inc..(Attorney Amanda Semaan added to party AT&T Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Semaan, Amanda)
October 10, 2024 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Matthews, upon Plaintiff AT&T Services, Inc. served on 9/30/2024, answer due 10/21/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon William Miller - Person Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (McKennon, Robert)
September 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
September 9, 2024 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. (jtil)
September 9, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
September 9, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 9, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil)
September 5, 2024 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Matthews. (McKennon, Robert)
September 5, 2024 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Matthews, (McKennon, Robert)
September 5, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Matthews. (McKennon, Robert)
September 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38160444 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff David Matthews. (Attorney Robert J. McKennon added to party David Matthews(pty:pla))(McKennon, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Matthews v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Represented By: Nicholas Adam West
Represented By: Robert J. McKennon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Semaan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?