Securities and Exchange Commission v. CoinW6
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| CoinW6 doing business as CoinW6.com doing business as 6hsh.com doing business as dmd567.com doing business as bybit.cc doing business as cglobalw.com |
| 2:2024cv07924 |
| September 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Otis D Wright |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 . Document number 5 and 6 due to clerical error. The Notice of Parties Court-Directed ADR Program and Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge without the judges initials on forms. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/17/2024, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) Modified on 9/17/2024 (ghap). |
| Filing 5 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/17/2024, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) Modified on 9/17/2024 (ghap). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew B. Reisig to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Not Required for US Government Attorney) filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Blau, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Blau, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attorney Daniel Oren Blau added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla))(Blau, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. CoinW6 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Matthew B Reisig |
| Represented By: | Daniel Oren Blau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CoinW6 doing business as CoinW6.com doing business as 6hsh.com doing business as dmd567.com doing business as bybit.cc doing business as cglobalw.com | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
