Rahul Sawhney v. AXS Group LLC
| Rahul Sawhney |
| AXS Group LLC |
| 2:2024cv08866 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AXS Group LLC answer now due 12/16/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant AXS Group LLC.(Attorney Robert H Platt added to party AXS Group LLC(pty:dft))(Platt, Robert) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rahul Sawhney, upon Defendant AXS Group LLC served on 10/24/2024, answer due 11/14/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, C T Corporation System, Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Bogdanovich, Stefan) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants AXS Group LLC. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rahul Sawhney. (Bogdanovich, Stefan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rahul Sawhney, (Bogdanovich, Stefan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rahul Sawhney. (Bogdanovich, Stefan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38396238 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Rahul Sawhney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stefan Bogdanovich added to party Rahul Sawhney(pty:pla))(Bogdanovich, Stefan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rahul Sawhney v. AXS Group LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AXS Group LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert H Platt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rahul Sawhney | |
| Represented By: | Philip L. Fraietta |
| Represented By: | Stefan Bogdanovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
