Westley Henson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Rhonda Ann Smith and Westley Henson |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and Aram Derderian |
| 2:2024cv08883 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Westley Henson, Rhonda Ann Smith. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Westley Henson, Rhonda Ann Smith. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Gehlawat, Neil) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Westley Henson re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 PURSUANT TO CCP 377.32 filed by Plaintiff Westley Henson. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Westley Henson, Rhonda Ann Smith. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38399682 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Westley Henson, Rhonda Ann Smith. (Attorney Neil K Gehlawat added to party Westley Henson(pty:pla), Attorney Neil K Gehlawat added to party Rhonda Ann Smith(pty:pla))(Gehlawat, Neil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
