Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc.
Plaintiff: Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant: Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv08975
Filed: October 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Referring Judge: A Joel Richlin
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central District's website at "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov" for Judge Dean D. Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. (see document for further details) (hr)
October 27, 2024 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc.. (shb)
October 22, 2024 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Lozeau, Michael)
October 19, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect document which is the civil cover sheet is attached. (car)
October 19, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 19, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 19, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (car)
October 17, 2024 Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, a non-profit corporation, (Lozeau, Michael)
October 17, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, a non-profit corporation. (Lozeau, Michael)
October 17, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, a non-profit corporation. (Lozeau, Michael)
October 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38418783 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, a non-profit corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit exhibit A) (Attorney Michael R Lozeau added to party LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, a non-profit corporation(pty:pla))(Lozeau, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Represented By: Kylah M. Staley
Represented By: Erina Kwon
Represented By: Benjamin Avi Harris
Represented By: Barak Kamelgard
Represented By: Michael R Lozeau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?