R and R Surgical Institute v. MSH International Canada Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: R and R Surgical Institute
Defendant: MSH International Canada Ltd. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2024cv08987
Filed: October 18, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND TO FILE MOTION FOR REMAND #11 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be November 22, 2024, and the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion to remand shall be December 9, 2024. (iv)
November 6, 2024 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MSH International Canada Ltd. answer now due 11/22/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery), Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 R and R Surgical Institute. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint and to File Motion for Remand)(Wentland, Adam)
October 23, 2024 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MSH International Canada Ltd. answer now due 11/8/2024, filed by Defendant MSH International Canada Ltd..(Slaught, Kathleen)
October 22, 2024 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant MSH International Canada Ltd., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on October 22, 2024. (Slaught, Kathleen)
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
October 22, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
October 22, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 22, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh)
October 18, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, MSH International Canada Ltd., filed by Plaintiff R and R Surgical Institute. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/19/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 18, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff R and R Surgical Institute, upon Defendant MSH International Canada Ltd. served on 9/19/2024, answer due 10/10/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Barbara Baine, Person Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/25/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 18, 2024 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant MSH International (Canada) Ltd., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on October 18, 2024. (Slaught, Kathleen)
October 18, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant MSH International (Canada) Ltd., identifying Plaintiff R & R Surgical Institute; MSH International (Canada) Ltd.. (Slaught, Kathleen)
October 18, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant MSH International (Canada) Ltd.. (Slaught, Kathleen)
October 18, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STCV24251 Receipt No: ACACDC-38422395 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant MSH International (Canada) Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration of Florent Secula in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Kathleen Cahill Slaught added to party MSH International (Canada) Ltd.(pty:dft))(Slaught, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R and R Surgical Institute v. MSH International Canada Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R and R Surgical Institute
Represented By: Rosa Lydia Arguelles Shirley
Represented By: Bruce Dizenfeld
Represented By: Adam G. Wentland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MSH International Canada Ltd.
Represented By: Kathleen Cahill Slaught
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?