Michael Dubrosky v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
Michael Dubrosky |
Honda Motor Company, Ltd. and American Honda Motor Co., Inc. |
2:2024cv09153 |
October 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Hernan D Vera |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky. upon American Honda Motor Co., Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/14/2024, answer due 1/13/2025. Waiver of Service signed by Michael L. Mallow. (Bernal, Alison) |
Filing 12 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (wm) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph B Kenney on behalf on Plaintiff.. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Matthew D Schelkopf on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
Filing 5 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky. (Bernal, Alison) |
Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky, (Bernal, Alison) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky. (Bernal, Alison) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky. (Bernal, Alison) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38456743 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Michael Dubrosky. (Attorney Alison M. Bernal added to party Michael Dubrosky(pty:pla))(Bernal, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.