Siwen Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: SIWEN ZHANG
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel
Case Number: 2:2024cv09501
Filed: November 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Siwen Zhang. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Zhang, JJ)
November 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr)
November 7, 2024 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (jtil)
November 7, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil)
November 2, 2024 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SIWEN ZHANG. (Zhang, JJ)
November 2, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SIWEN ZHANG. (Zhang, JJ)
November 2, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SIWEN ZHANG, identifying alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David Radel. (Zhang, JJ)
November 2, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38515735 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff SIWEN ZHANG. (Attorney JJ Zhang added to party SIWEN ZHANG(pty:pla))(Zhang, JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siwen Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SIWEN ZHANG
Represented By: JJ Zhang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M. Radel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?