North Florida Productions, LLC et al v. Beige Curtain, Inc. et al
Gordon P. Jones |
Beige Curtain, Inc. and Neon Trees, Inc. |
P. C. Liang |
North Florida Productions, LLC |
2:2024mc00004 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:24-cv-00267-PSG (MRWx). The previous case number, 2:24-mc-00004-UA, is hereby terminated. (et) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Order Re: Service of Process by Registered Process Server filed by Movant, Assignee Record P. C. Liang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). (et) |
Filing 1 CERTIFICATION OF JUDGMENT received from USBC Middle District of Florida for the Jacksonville Division, case number 3:17-bk-3616-JAF entered, Final Judgment in the sending district on 5/10/2019. Entered in this district on 1/10/2024., filed by Movant P. C. Liang. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.