Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. CalAmp Corp.
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant: Calamp Corp
Counter-Claimant: Calamp Corp
Counter-Defendant: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Case Number: 2:2025cv06695
Filed: July 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MINUTES (In Chambers) Order Consolidating Actions by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Case No. 2:25-cv-06695-KK-SP is CONSOLIDATED with Case No. 2:25-cv- 04890-KK-SP for all purposes; 2. All future filings shall be made in Case No. 2:25-cv-04890-KK-SP; 3. The Clerk of Court shall administratively close Case No. 2:25-cv-06695-KK-SP (JS-6); 4. Plaintiff shall file a consolidated Second Amended Complaint no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order; and 5. Defendant's pending Motion to Stay is DENIED in light of the consolidation, and Defendant is ordered to file an amended Motion to Stay no later than seven (7) days from the filing of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (See document for further information).; denying #42 MOTION to Stay Case. (aco)
September 23, 2025 Filing 50 AMENDED ANSWER and AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS to Amended Complaint/Petition,,, #44 Defendant's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. (Talebi, Rodeen)
September 23, 2025 Filing 49 RESPONSE filed by Counter Claimant Calamp Corp, Defendant Calamp Corpto Generic Text Only Entry,,, 46 Defendant's Response to Court Order Regarding Case Consolidation (Talebi, Rodeen)
September 23, 2025 Filing 48 RESPONSE filed by Counter Defendant Fleet Connect Solutions LLC, Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLCto Generic Text Only Entry,,, 46 (Notice and Order re: Consolidation) (McDonough, James)
September 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 47 PATENT STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This Order applies to all cases involving a claim of infringement, non-infringement, invalidity, or unenforceability of a utility patent. The Local Civil Rules of the Central District of California and this Court's Civil Standing Order shall also apply to such actions, except to the extent they are inconsistent with any provision of this Order. (See document for further information). (aco)
September 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 46 NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: On August 13, 2025, the instant matter was transferred to Judge Kato. Dkt. 31. On that same day, a similar action, Case No. 2:25-cv-04890-KK-SP, was transferred to Judge Kato. The two cases involve the exact same parties and accused products. Both cases have a pending Motion to Stay. Given the similarities, the parties are directed to file separate briefing no later than seven (7) days from this order, addressing why the two matters should not be consolidated. Failure to file a timely response will result in consolidation and may result in sanctions, including monetary sanctions for failure to comply with Court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS BY AN ADDITIONAL 14 DAYS by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. WHEREAS, it appearing that good cause supports the stipulation, it is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have up to and including September 25, 2025 to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant's Counterclaims. RE: First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise Respond to Counterclaims #43 . (aco)
September 10, 2025 Filing 44 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Calamp Corp amending Complaint - (Discovery),,,,, #1 , filed by Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,583 (LTE), #2 Exhibit B Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,583 (Wi-Fi and LTE), #3 Exhibit C Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,616 (LTE), #4 Exhibit D Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,616 (Wi-Fi and LTE), #5 Exhibit E Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,941,223, #6 Exhibit F Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,450,955, #7 Exhibit G Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,862,184)(McDonough, James)
September 10, 2025 Filing 43 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise Respond to Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 35) filed by Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDonough, James)
September 5, 2025 Filing 42 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Resolution of Ex Parte Reexaminations of Asserted Patents filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. Motion set for hearing on 10/16/2025 at 09:30 AM before Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Declaration in Support, #16 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
September 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. APPLICATION of Attorney James F. McDonough, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Defendant Fleet Connect Solutions LLC, Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC, designating Ryan E. Hatch as local counsel.; granting #39 Non-Resident Attorney James F. McDonough, III. (aco)
August 29, 2025 Filing 40 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ryan E. Hatch counsel for Counter Defendant Fleet Connect Solutions LLC, Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. Adding Ryan E. Hatch as counsel of record for Fleet Connect Solutions LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Hatch, Ryan)
August 29, 2025 Filing 39 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney James F. McDonough, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Defendant Fleet Connect Solutions LLC, Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-40412677) filed by Plaintiff Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing (State Bar of Georgia), #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Ryan E. Hatch added to party Fleet Connect Solutions LLC(pty:cd), Attorney Ryan E. Hatch added to party Fleet Connect Solutions LLC(pty:pla)) (Hatch, Ryan)
August 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Scheduling Conference set for 10/16/2025 at 10:00 AM before Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
August 22, 2025 Filing 37 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #35 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. The Counterclaim caption is missing on the title page. The title of the complaint must name all the parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco)
August 21, 2025 Filing 36 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Calamp Corp, identifying Lynrock Lake Master Fund LP; Fleet Connect Solutions LLC; CalAmp Corp.. (Talebi, Rodeen)
August 21, 2025 Filing 35 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),,,,, #1 with JURY DEMAND Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Fleet Connect Solutions LLC filed by Defendant Calamp Corp.(Talebi, Rodeen)
August 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. APPLICATION of Attorney Michael R. Ellis to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Calamp Corp, designating Rodeen Talebi as local counsel is GRANTED.; granting #30 Non-Resident Attorney Michael R. Ellis. (aco)
August 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. APPLICATION of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Calamp Corp, designating Rodeen Talebi as local counsel is GRANTED.; granting #29 Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay. (aco)
August 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 32 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
August 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:24-cv-00376 KK (SPx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:25-cv-06695 KK (SPx). Signed by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato (lh)
August 13, 2025 Filing 30 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael R. Ellis to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Calamp Corp (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-40293463) filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
August 13, 2025 Filing 29 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Calamp Corp (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-40293426) filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
July 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #26 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The deadline for Defendant CalAmp Corp. to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED from July 29, 2025, to August 21, 2025. (iv)
July 30, 2025 Filing 27 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Stipulation #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv)
July 29, 2025 Filing 26 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Calamp Corp answer now due 8/21/2025, re Complaint - (Discovery),,,,, #1 filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Rodeen Talebi added to party Calamp Corp(pty:dft))(Talebi, Rodeen)
July 28, 2025 Filing 25 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. Amended Related Case(s): 5:24-cv-00376; 2:24-cv-07486; 2:24-cv-10435; 2:25-cv-06695; 2:25-cv-04890 (Talebi, Rodeen)
July 28, 2025 Filing 24 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Calamp Corp. Related Case(s): 5:24cv376; 2:24cv7486; 2:24cv10435; 2:25cv350; 2:25cv4890 (Talebi, Rodeen)
July 25, 2025 Filing 23 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 22 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay on behalf of Defendant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at [email protected]. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 21 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael R. Ellis on behalf of Defendant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at [email protected]. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 20 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney James F. McDonough, III on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at [email protected]. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 19 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan L. Hardt on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at [email protected]. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 18 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at [email protected]. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 17 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
July 25, 2025 Filing 15 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 2:25-cv-00350-JRG-RSP, from USDC Eastern District of Texas. The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:25-cv-06695-MWF (JCx). (et)
July 24, 2025 Filing 14 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Texas Eastern
June 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Transfer Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/14/2025. (NKL) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
June 9, 2025 Filing 12 JOINT MOTION to Transfer Venue by CalAmp Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellis, Michael) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
May 23, 2025 Filing 11 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. CalAmp Corp. answer is now due 6/16/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(mdj) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
May 23, 2025 Filing 10 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by CalAmp Corp. Summons originally served on 4/09/2025. Agreed new answer date is 6/16/2025.(McNabnay, Neil) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 30, 2025 Filing 9 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. CalAmp Corp. answer is now due 5/30/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(KLC) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 29, 2025 Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by CalAmp Corp.. Summons originally served on 04/09/2025. Agreed new answer date is 05/30/2025.(McNabnay, Neil) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 10, 2025 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. CalAmp Corp. served on 4/9/2025. (McDonough, James) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 9, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Rozier, Carey) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 9, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Lloyd Hardt on behalf of Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (Hardt, Jonathan) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 8, 2025 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to CalAmp Corp.. (KLC) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 8, 2025 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (KLC) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 8, 2025 District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne added. (KLC) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 7, 2025 Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC (McDonough, James) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 7, 2025 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McDonough, James) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]
April 7, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against CalAmp Corp. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10769068.), filed by Fleet Connect Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,583 (LTE), #2 Exhibit B. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,583 (WiFi, LTE), #3 Exhibit C. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,616 (LTE), #4 Exhibit D. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,616 (WiFi, LTE), #5 Exhibit E. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,941,223, #6 Exhibit F. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,961,586, #7 Exhibit G. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,206,837, #8 Exhibit H. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,450,955, #9 Exhibit I. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,741,968, #10 Exhibit J. Evidence of Use Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,862,184, #11 Additional Attachment(s) Proposed Summons, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Additional Attachment(s) Addendum to Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonough, James) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/24/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. CalAmp Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Represented By: James F. McDonough, III
Represented By: Jonathan L. Hardt
Represented By: Ryan E. Hatch
Represented By: Carey Matthew Rozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calamp Corp
Represented By: Neil J. McNabnay
Represented By: Michael R. Ellis
Represented By: Rodeen Talebi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-claimant: Calamp Corp
Represented By: Rodeen Talebi
Represented By: Neil J. McNabnay
Represented By: Michael R. Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Represented By: James F. McDonough, III
Represented By: Ryan E. Hatch
Represented By: Jonathan L. Hardt
Represented By: Carey Matthew Rozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?