Lawrence Schallert v. Quantum Health, Inc. et al
| Lawrence Schallert |
| Quantum Health, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2025cv09621 |
| October 8, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 10 The period to decline consent to a magistrate judge has expired. No timely declination of consent has been received by the Court. Each party is deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to the Local Rules. The case shall now proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (im) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert, upon Defendant Quantum Health, Inc. served on 10/22/2025, answer due 12/12/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Courtney Leiker person apparently in charge in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 8 Text Only Entry - The Court has reviewed the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, filed November 4, 2025. Dkt. No. 7. According to the stipulation, Defendant Quantum Health, Inc. was served the complaint on October 22, 2025, however, no proof of service of the summons, complaint, and Notice of Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent ("Notice of Assignment") has been filed. See Local Rules 4-6, 73-2.1. If a waiver of service of the summons and complaint was effectuated, then a proof of service is still required for the Notice of Assignment to calculate when the period to decline consent expires. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a proof of service by November 10, 2025. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (im) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Quantum Health, Inc. answer now due 12/12/2025, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Quantum Health, Inc..(Attorney Jeremy Anthony Avila added to party Quantum Health, Inc.(pty:dft))(Avila, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Quantum Health, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert, identifying None. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert. (Tauler, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-40661212 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Schallert. (Attorney Robert Tauler added to party Lawrence Schallert(pty:pla))(Tauler, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
