Anthony Edwards v. A. Bender et al
| Anthony Edwards |
| Correctional Officer A. Bender, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso and T. Brown |
| 2:2025cv12458 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #17 . Plaintiff shall file opposition to the Motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. At that time, the Court will take the Motion under submission without oral argument, unless the Court otherwise orders. Failure timely to file opposition to the Motion may result in the dismissal of the action. (sh) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Medina, Evan) |
| Filing 16 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS Ex Parte APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT, #1 , #14 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(san) |
Filing 15
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: granting in part #14 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' application is GRANTED in part. Defendants' responsive pleading is now due no later than June 17, 2026. (sh) Modified on 5/15/2026 (sh).
|
| Filing 14 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/2/2026 re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 filed by Defendants A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Medina, Evan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso, identifying Thury, Bender, Brown, Tomelloso, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation & The State of California. (Medina, Evan) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendants D. Tomelloso, M. Thury, A. Bender, T. Brown. upon D. Tomelloso waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/17/2026, answer due 5/18/2026; M. Thury waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/17/2026, answer due 5/18/2026; A. Bender waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/17/2026, answer due 5/18/2026; T. Brown waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/17/2026, answer due 5/18/2026. Waiver of Service signed by Evan D. Medina. (Medina, Evan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Evan Medina on behalf of Defendants A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso (Attorney Evan Medina added to party A. Bender(pty:dft), Attorney Evan Medina added to party T. Brown(pty:dft), Attorney Evan Medina added to party M. Thury(pty:dft), Attorney Evan Medina added to party D. Tomelloso(pty:dft))(Medina, Evan) |
| Filing 10 CDCR Report of Service Waiver Received. This document is restricted to court users only; no NEF has been issued, and the document is not available electronically. (sh) |
| Filing 9 INMATE STATEMENT REPORT re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Mens Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo #2 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Edwards.(san) |
| Filing 8 Text Only Entry - Service Packet for defendants emailed to the CDCR, USMS. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (bem) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The United States Marshal has been ordered to serve the Summons and Complaint as indicated on the Order Directing Service of Process by the Marshal. See document for details. (es)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 as to Defendant A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso. (es) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS UNDER THE CENTRAL DISTRICT E-SERVICE PILOT PROGRAM by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service shall be initiated on the following defendants in the following capacity: SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS. (es)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee is GRANTED. (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Mens Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for Anthony Edwards BS-8944 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account Statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified Prison Trust Account Statement in pdf format to [email protected] with the case number and inmate name in the subject line as reflected on this notification. filed by Plaintiff. Anthony Edwards. (et) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants A. Bender, T. Brown, M. Thury, D. Tomelloso pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by Plaintiff Anthony Edwards. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
