AECOM v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
| AECOM |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. |
| 2:2026cv00577 |
| January 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Change of address by Michael J Hartley attorney for Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.. Changing attorneys address to 900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2600 Los Angeles, California 90017. Filed by Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.. (Hartley, Michael) |
Filing 26
CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER [FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)] by Judge Percy Anderson. 1. Establishing a Discovery Cut-off Date of December 14, 2026; 2. Setting Motion Cut-off date of December 21, 2026; 3. Setting Final Pretrial Conference for January 15, 2027, at 1:30 p.m.; 4. Setting Jury Trial Date of February 23, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 25 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has received the parties' joint 26(f) report and finds that a scheduling conference is not necessary. Dates set by the Court in this action are listed in the "Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates" attached to this order. The scheduling conference currently on calendar for May 18, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. is hereby vacated, and the matter taken off calendar. The Court has entered a Protective Order in this action. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, this matter has been referred to private mediation. Final Pretrial Conference 01/15/27 at 1:30 p.m. Jury Trial 02/23/27 at 9:00 a.m. (See document for additional deadlines and details). (aco) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Percy Anderson. This case is referred to private mediation. Counsel are directed to contact the private mediator of their choice to arrange a date and time for the mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than December 28, 2026. (aco)
|
|
Filing 23
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court enters the following protective order: (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 22 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Plaintiff AECOM(Hirsch, Craig) |
| Filing 21 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiff AECOM.. (Hirsch, Craig) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Order re Scheduling Meeting of Counsel and Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiff AECOM. (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 19 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for May 18, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa..(Hartley, Michael) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., identifying AIG Property Casualty U.S., Inc.; AIG Property Casualty Inc.; American International Group, Inc.. (Hartley, Michael) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 30 DAYS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. ("National Union") to respond to the First Amended Complaint, and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. National Union's deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to April 3, 2026. RE: Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint, #15 . (aco)
|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. answer now due 4/3/2026, filed by Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order)(Attorney Michael J Hartley added to party National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.(pty:dft))(Hartley, Michael) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff AECOM, upon Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. served on 2/11/2026, answer due 3/4/2026. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Josh Swindell, Authorized Employee, CSC Lawyers Inc., Agent for Service of Process Authorized to Accept service under F.R.C.P. Rule 4. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 as to Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (aco) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #11 filed by Plaintiff AECOM. (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff AECOM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A district court may, and should, grant leave to amend when it appears that subject matter jurisdiction may exist, even though the complaint inadequately alleges jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, if any, is to be filed by February 4, 2026. The failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date or to adequately allege the Court's subject matter jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff AECOM, identifying AECOM. (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff AECOM. (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff AECOM. (Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-41314302 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff AECOM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Mikaela Colleen Gallagher-Whitman added to party AECOM(pty:pla))(Gallagher-Whitman, Mikaela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
