George Alexander Lugo v. City of Redondo Beach et al
| George Alexander Lugo |
| City of Redondo Beach, Redondo Beach Police, Officer Rista and Officer Rockseth |
| 2:2026cv04413 |
| April 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Angela C C Viramontes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: The application contains active form fields that distort and compress the text when flattened for docketing, making portions of the response illegible where the text exceeds the visible boundaries of the fillable box Other error(s) with document(s): The application must be resubmitted and flattened. (dc) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (mrv) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE REQUESTS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Angela C. C. Viramontes: denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in forma pauperis in these cases, IT IS ORDERED that within 30 days of this Order. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (mrv)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF RESOURCES FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Angela C. C. Viramontes. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (mrv) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS filed by plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): No CV-71, civil cover sheet. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document lacks required signature. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Referred), #1 filed by plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Redondo Beach Police, Rista, Rockseth Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Angela Catherine Claire Viramontes., filed by plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
