Brandon Joe Williams v. City of Glendale
Plaintiff: Brandon Joe Williams
Defendant: City of Glendale
Case Number: 2:2026cv08035
Filed: July 15, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: The Court, on its own motion hereby CONTINUES the Motion to Dismiss #9 , presently set for September 30, 2026, to October 21, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6B, 6th Floor, 411 W. Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California, 92701. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 3, 2026 Filing 13 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams. (Williams, Brandon)
August 28, 2026 Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. The motion #9 is set for an in-person hearing on September 30, 2026 at 10:00am before Magistrate Judge Spaeth in Courtroom 6B, 6th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701. (kh)
August 28, 2026 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 . The following error(s) was found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Other: The parties are required to review Judge Spaeth's procedures page, https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-autumn-d-spaeth, for important procedures regarding motions. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (kh)
August 27, 2026 Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendant City of Glendale. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1, #2 Exhibit A2, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E1, #7 Exhibit E2)(Arias, Carl)
August 27, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant City of Glendale. (Attachments: #1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF GLENDALES MOTION TO DISMISS) (Attorney Carl Bernard Arias added to party City of Glendale(pty:dft)) (Arias, Carl)
August 12, 2026 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams, upon Defendant City of Glendale served on 8/6/2026, answer due 8/27/2026. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nadia Johnson, authorized representative in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Williams, Brandon)
August 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: IT IS ORDERED that the Application for Permission for Electronic Filing by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams #6 is hereby GRANTED. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (kh)
August 3, 2026 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams. (kh)
August 3, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RESOURCES FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS. (et)
August 3, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et)
July 15, 2026 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams. (et)
July 15, 2026 Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant City of Glendale. (et)
July 15, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant City of Glendale. Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Filing fee$405 FEE PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Brandon Joe Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandon Joe Williams v. City of Glendale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Joe Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Glendale
Represented By: Carl Bernard Arias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?