Bourell v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Richard Allen Bourell |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and PNC Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2026cv10021 |
| September 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant PNC Bank, N.A., identifying PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.-Corporate Parent; PNC Bancorp, Inc.-Affiliate; Richard Allen Bourell-Interested Party-Plaintiff Related. (Hehir, E.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant PNC Bank, N.A.. (Hehir, E.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 26NNCV04164 Receipt No: ACACDC-43251164 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant PNC Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Document - Docket Report, #2 State Court Document - Notice of Case Assignment, #3 State Court Document - ADR Information Package, #4 State Court Document - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 State Court Document - Summons, #6 State Court Document - Complaint, #7 State Court Document - Notice of Case Management Conf., #8 State Court Document - Clerk's Certificate of Service, #9 State Court Document - Order to Show Cause) (Attorney E. Christine Hehir added to party PNC Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Hehir, E.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
