John Albert Richardson v. P. Vasquez et al
Case Number: 5:2004cv01193
Filed: September 23, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Marc L. Goldman
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 77 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Accordingly, the Court orders that Petitioner be released from California State Prison, forthwith, pending his re-sentencing. Petitioner shall not leave the Central District of California until his re-sentencing on June 30, 2010. (ake)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition 1 is GRANTED. The state superior court shall release or resentence Petitioner within 60 days of this date. (rla)
May 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman. It is the intent of the Court to recommend that judgment be entered granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus and directing the state court proceedings to resentence petitioner commence within 60 days of the date of this Order. Objections to entry of such an Order and Judgment shall be filed no later than May 19, 2010. (ade)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Albert Richardson v. P. Vasquez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?