Jan Klimala v. Dow Jones and Company Inc et al Featured Case
Case Number: 5:2004cv01522
Filed: December 10, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen G. larson
Presiding Judge: A Howard Matz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2006 Filing 20 Mail Returned addressed to 2029 Century park east, suite 3300, Los "Angeles Ca 9006-3063 re 18 Notice of Document Discrepancies - Granting, (yc, )
December 15, 2005 Filing 19 STIPULATION for dismissal pursuant to FRCP41(a)(1)with prejudice filed by plaintiff Jan Klimala. (yc, )
December 15, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING Stipulation for dismissal submitted by Plaintiff Jan Klimala received on 12/14/2005 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(yc, )
December 15, 2005 (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.), ***Terminated all deadlines and hearings. (yc, )
August 22, 2005 Filing 17 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL filed by plaintiff Jan Klimala. (mrgo, )
July 11, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Motion set for hearing on 1/23/2006 at 11:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2006 11:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. Jury Trial set for 2/7/2006 08:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz.(sv)
July 11, 2005 Filing 15 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court orders the dates as indicated on Scheduling and Case Management Order filed this date and accepts the parties' designation of L.R. 16-14: Settlement Procedure No. 3. Plaintiff shall notify the settlement officer immediately of the Court's referral and presumptive schedule and file a status report with this Court confirming same. All DOES dismissed.Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (smo, )
July 8, 2005 Filing 13 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Aaron Ray Boyd, Daren Lipinsky on behalf of Plaintiff Jan Klimala. Filed by plaintiff Jan Klimala. (mrgo, )
July 1, 2005 Filing 14 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Jan Klimala. Joint Report Rule 26(f) 8 (yc, )
June 1, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Stephen G. Larson : Regarding production of confidential information. (See document for specifics)(mrgo, )
May 16, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f)SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge A. Howard Matz: If plaintiff has not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on all defendants, plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three days thereafter. Defendants also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three days thereafter. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/5/2005. Scheduling Conference set for 7/11/2005 at 1:30 p.m. before Honorable A. Howard Matz.(smo, )
May 10, 2005 Filing 10 Notice of Withdrawal of Jury Demand 5 filed by plaintiff Jan Klimala. (mrgo, )
May 2, 2005 Filing 9 COPY OF DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT. filed by defendant Dow Jones and Company Inc. (yc, )
April 27, 2005 Filing 8 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed; estimated length of trial 10-12 days. (mrgo, )
February 18, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz, following filing of complaint assigned to Judge Matz: COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF SHALL SERVE THIS ORDER ON ALL DEFENDANTS AND OR THEIR COUNSEL ALONG WITH THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT, OR IF THAT IS NOT PRACTICABLE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE THEREAFTER. IF THIS CASE WAS ASSIGNED TO THIS COURT AFTER BENG REMOVED FROM STATE COURT, THE DEFENDANT WHO REMOVED THE CASE SHALL SERVE THIS ORDER ON ALL OTHER PARTIES. This case has been asssigned to the calendar of Judge A Howard Matz. Judge Matz is intent on assuring that as called for in Fed Civ P.L this case will proceed so as to secure (a) Just speedy and inexpensive determination. (see file for details)(yc, )
February 10, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Robert J. Timlin. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 224. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Robert J. Timlin to Judge A. Howard Matz for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge ED CV 04-1522 AHM (SGLx).(la, )
January 5, 2005 Filing 5 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Jan Klimala.(mrgo, )
December 10, 2004 Filing 4 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(D) filed by defendants Dow Jones and Company Inc, Cynthia Cortina. (jp, )
December 10, 2004 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Dow Jones and Company Inc, Cynthia Cortina. (jp, )
December 10, 2004 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Dow Jones and Company Inc, Cynthia Cortina. (jp, )
December 10, 2004 Filing 1 NOTICE AND PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number 419896 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Robert J. Timlin, Referred to Discovery Judge Stephen G. Larson. (Filing fee $ 150), filed by defendants Dow Jones and Company Inc, Cynthia Cortina.(jp, )
December 10, 2004 FAX number for Attorneys Ann Haley Fromholz, Emanuel Soleiman Shirazi is 310-201-5219. (jp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jan Klimala v. Dow Jones and Company Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?