Thedois Brown v. S Ryan
Case Number: 5:2005cv00762
Filed: August 16, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey W. Johnson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 119 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: Based on the foregoing, petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing and within fourteen (14) days of this Order, why his federal habeas peti tion should not be dismissed as moot. After reviewing petitioner's response, the Court will consider whether to order briefing from respondent. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/23/2017. (See attached order for further details.) (jsan)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/22/2014. On August 23, 2013, this Court issued an order granting petitioner's request to hold this action in abeyance. The Court also ordered p etitioner to file a status report every 90 days after petitioner's state petition had been filed. Petitioner's last status report was due March 10, 2014. However, petitioner has not filed a status report since December 9, 2013. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to file the status report or show cause within 21 days of the date of this order why the stay should not be lifted and this matter not proceed on the previously exhausted claims only. (jm)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 51 . IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered granting the Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the Second Amended Petition is untimely. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thedois Brown v. S Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?